You don't actually need the [wrap~] as the domain of [cos~] is already suited.
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:17:54 +0200 Roman Haefeli <reduzie...@yahoo.de> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 02:10 -0700, Jaime Oliver wrote: > > Hi all, > > > It would be great it phasor~ and/or osc~ could receive phase > > information (right inlet) as a signal. > > objects like *~ can recognize if they are receiving a float or a > > signal on their left inlet? > > > > > > if this feature was added in vanilla, would it break anything? > > is it possible, worthwhile? > > is there a third party external doing this? > > As IOhannes pointed out, it doesn't make too much sense to have the > phase inlets fed by a signal. > > What would you probably want is to be able to constantly shift the phase > over time relative to an initially set absolute phase. This can be > achieve by adding a constant to the [phasor~] signal and wrapping the > the result. > > [phasor~] > | > | [inlet~ relative-phase-shift] > | | > [+~ ] > | > [wrap~] (<- use Pd's internal [wrap~] here, not zexy's) > > > For a similar [osc~] replacement, just connect [wrap~]'s outlet to a > [cos~]. > > Roman > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Der fr_he Vogel f_ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: > http://mail.yahoo.de > > -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Sent from my 3 (http://three.co.uk) mobile broadband Third world internet for a first world economy. * 20 bytes/second * 99% packet loss * 60 second latency All for only £20/month (Odious and predatory terms apply) _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list