> Actually, I think (it's not the first time I say that, I guess), that > all inlets of object classes, which have signal outlets (or all > objects that convert from message domain to signal domain) should > take the exact timing into account.
Yeah! No object should be left out! Every single object should take exact timing into accounts, or at the very least, have a "v" counterpart that does (I guess the objects that don't are faster, so when sub-block accuracy is not needed one may actually prefer the "inaccurate" version).
By the way, you say all those objects that convert from message to signal domain. Why not the other way round too? I always wished there was a [vthreshold~] for example. Or is it physically impossible? I mean perhaps you get the information one block too late?
> Also it is cumbersome to have to know which object > classes support exact timing and which not. Absolutely! thanks m. -- Matteo Sisti Sette matteosistise...@gmail.com http://www.matteosistisette.com _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
