uh I missed roman inputs, fortunately there are the archives " Are you implying there was no dance music since the 80's? How bad will actual 'best technologies' will be in a few years? Is that a discussion about certain aesthethics you're looking for or about technical possibilities? "
I took dance as an example of musics that needs to answer a number of sound characteristics where technical possibilities are seriously implied in aestethics. Not to say that an instrument would sound better if there is a background image or such, but the way we are accessing data and modulate them has a severe influence on inspiration. At the end the best compromise I've found is like obiwannabe's work, where the patch is the piece. ----- Mail Original ----- De: "Mathieu Bouchard" <ma...@artengine.ca> À: "Roman Haefeli" <reduzie...@yahoo.de> Cc: "colet patrice" <colet.patr...@free.fr>, "pd-list" <pd-list@iem.at> Envoyé: Vendredi 16 Avril 2010 18h53:40 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd? On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:04 +0200, colet.patr...@free.fr wrote: >> show me a patch that correctly mix soundfiles. > That interests me. Can you elaborate a bit more what you mean by > "mixing"? Interesting, I was more concerned by the use of the word « correctly ». For a even a simple cross-fade, any way of smoothing the output of a slider is a potential matter of personal preference, and whichever way you pick has eventual slightly different consequences on the result. _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801 _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
