On 2010-04-19 09:27, Frank Barknecht wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 03:24:56PM +0200, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: >> By the way a similar improvement in the message domain would be the >> possibility to force an order among [r]s of a given [s]. In this >> case the interface would be simpler: just a numeric argument for the >> [r], for example: [s xxx], [r xxx 0], [r xxx 1], etc. where receives >> with the same number would be executed in unpredictable order. > > Btw. [gemhead] has this in a way. >
and [gemreceive] has it exactly in this way.
(its [gemreceive] because i would like to replace [gemhead] with an
abstraction, and don't depend on external libraries like iemguts where
you have the [oreceive] ("Ordered RECEIVE") object, both of which are
identically)
fgamsdr
IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
