Its definitely worthwhile to have more builds. But in the interest of simplicity, the 'official' downloads will be ones that run on only 'official' packages. The "Contributed Builds" can be anything.

.hc

On Jun 9, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Martin Eckart wrote:

So my first attempt compiled okay but without gmerlin support in Gem
which is necessary for my patches at least.  I just remembered that I
need the gmerlin packages from Roman's PPA
( https://launchpad.net/~reduzierer/+archive/rdz-pd-extra+deps/ ) for it
to work, so I've installed those and am compiling again.  Maybe it is
worth having 2 auto-builds?  One normal and a second with gmerlin (and
possibly other configurations) support?

-martin

On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:51 -0400, Martin Eckart wrote:
OK, cool.  I'm mostly doing it for interest's sake.

Does Gem compile with gmerlin/avdecoder support by default now or do
extra packages (libgavl-dev?) need to be installed for that?

-martin

On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:41 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:33 PM, András Murányi wrote:

2010/6/9 Martin Eckart <imart...@gmail.com>
       I'm running the auto-builder now on my server and will let
       you know how
       that goes.  Just wanted to make a note that rsync created a
       directory
       called ~/auto-build/pd- instead of pd-extended because your
       email
       introduced a linebreak when I cut/pasted (and I didn't
       notice).

       So far so good.  Assuming I get the auto-build to work on a
       daily?
       basis, where's the best place for me to put the most recent
       package?
       Just on my own server (imartron.com)?

       -martin




Hi Martin,

i'm just composing a wiki page on this topic, shall be online by
tomorrow under this one:
http://puredata.info/docs/developer/AutoBuildProcess
If your box is Lucid/64 note that i'm just upgrading mine to the
same, so from tomorrow, Lucid/64 builds will be online (and no more
Jaunty builds). Actually this is something I wanted to ask HC for
the Wiki page; does it have an advantage to have more than one
autobuild machine working on the same platform? (Is it handled at
all, and in a way where redundancy serves continuity?)


We don't need more than one build per platform posted.  Since Andras
has been running his machine as a build server for a while, that's the
one I'd prefer.  Its all setup.


Otherwise, if people make builds, they should start by posting them
anywhere online.  If it becomes a regular thing, then we can talk
about how to make the uploads automatic.


.hc



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                             http://at.or.at/hans/




_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list








----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            kill your television



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to