Hmmm... I run across this thread when searching for information about [mtx_*~]. If I load iemmatrix and I instantiate [matrix~] it tells me that it is deprecated and please replace by [mtx_*~]. Which is fine until I save, quit Pd and reopen the patch after which [mtx_*~] is no longer available until I again instantiate the deprecated [matrix~] again. Following the advice given in this thread I created a [mtx_mul~] and it seems to behave the same as [mtx_*~]. Yet, [mtx_*~] alone is impossible to use. The rationale of this feature escapes me.
Is it safe to use [mtx_mul~] (i.e. it will not become deprecated sometime in the foreseeable future in favour of its * brother)? Thanks ./MiS On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:20 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote: > Max wrote: >> where is [mtx_*]? > > it's in iemmatrix. > >> >> i've loaded iemmatrix and iem_matrix > > try instantiating [mtx_mul]. > afterwards you might be able to use [mtx_*] directly. > > gfmadr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list