Hmmm...  I run across this thread when searching for information about
[mtx_*~].  If I load iemmatrix and I instantiate [matrix~] it tells me
that it is deprecated and please replace by [mtx_*~].  Which is fine
until I save, quit Pd and reopen the patch after which  [mtx_*~] is no
longer available until I again instantiate the deprecated [matrix~]
again.  Following the advice given in this thread I created a
[mtx_mul~] and it seems to behave the same as [mtx_*~].  Yet, [mtx_*~]
alone is impossible to use.  The rationale of this feature escapes me.

Is it safe to use [mtx_mul~] (i.e. it will not become deprecated
sometime in the foreseeable future in favour of its * brother)?

Thanks

./MiS

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:20 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote:
> Max wrote:
>> where is [mtx_*]?
>
> it's in iemmatrix.
>
>>
>> i've loaded iemmatrix and iem_matrix
>
> try instantiating [mtx_mul].
> afterwards you might be able to use [mtx_*] directly.
>
> gfmadr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to