What's the point of advocating a proprietary operating system that does not even have good quality software?
can you give examples? I work with Pd, sibelius, reaper, ...
Other think is: do not talk about price when you talk about free software.... That's losing the point. I think free software should be of very good quality and people should be encouraged to pay for it if they make money of of it, or if they can contribute with something.
I never talked about price about free software, don't know where you got that. Can you be more precise?
I think all software should be of good quality. When I spend X hours trying to work with an OS and I get nothing done, that's a criteria for me to leave that os and go to an other where I can produce something, not just be solving problems all the time. but that's my decision.
Since you speak of contributing, you can go back read my e-mail. I've given a donation to Hans for his work on Pd-ext (nothing fancy), and also bought the hard disk where the windows builds on the compile farm are stored. Besides that, I've spent lots of time helping with documentation (go back to read my mail). So, we agree on this.
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
