maybe this is a bug od pd-gui? (well, poor performance *is* a bug) 2010/9/27 András Murányi <muran...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:45 AM, João Pais <jmmmp...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Well, it's not very exportable as i have modified/overwritten some >>> abstractions made by others. Baaad practice! >>> I'm trying to attach it now and i hope i works. Need pd-extended and many >>> libs from it, moonlib for sure. >> >> not much, some abstractions are missing. >> >> anyway, even with the patch not working, I can see something is >> definitively wrong. just by opening it with audio off, I get consistent 50% >> cpu usage - which means it's using a whole processor of my dual core. unless >> one of the missing abs is the problem, I would suggest you spend some hours >> bug tracking. > > yes, i've spent some nights bug tracking, and at one point i thought ask the > list too... :o) > something is definitely wrong! > > >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic <i...@vt.edu> wrote: >> FWIW you may want to try to simply cut pieces of the patch while it is >> running and observe the cpu load meter until it drops. That way you should >> be able to locate the problem quicker. >> > > yes, i was trying thing like this, and will go on until i find what i messed > up. > I was just starting to think that it's normal and i have to live with it (or > get a few more CPU cores) but now you guys reassured me that the bug is > somewhere... in the haystack > > Andras > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
