On Oct 6, 2010, at 10:07 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:

Simon Wise wrote:
On 06/10/10 21:07, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

On Oct 5, 2010, at 5:00 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:

ola,

You can see which Pd libraries people are working on adding to
Debian here, they all start with pd-*:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged

that's what i mean, i don't see unauthorized, pdp or pidip,
neither in abandonned libs,
neither in 'to be packaged'...

I think the whole project of getting extended and the packages set up and building in Debian is just now getting to the point where lots of libraries could be done. Getting the pattern right obviously meant starting with a couple first, then adding a batch which were easier to do. Now it is possible to use these as templates. Doing it carefully in stages seems like a good idea to me, it has taken a couple of months to get to this point.


Simon

you're wise, simon

but obviously the intention is to abandon some libraries
( once again and again, unilateral decision
without discussion )

i'm tired of wasting time

ciao,
sevy


There is no one saying we have to abandon any of the libraries that are included in Pd-extended. I am saying that I cannot keep up with all of the maintenance of all of the libraries that I currently maintain in Pd-extended. I need help with that. I have taken on many libraries which have no other maintainer. For things like PDP, PiDiP, etc. I hope that people who actually use them will maintain them, and I can help where I can. I barely do anything with video, so I hardly know how to test PDP, etc.

Even better, the people working on pure:dyne packages and people working on Pd-extended packages can merge efforts, get them into Debian, then there will be no difference between PDP/PiDiP/etc whether its included in pure:dyne or Pd-extended on Debian, Ubuntu, etc. We are already well along that road.

.hc


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink- collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to