Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 14:46 +0000, Jamie Bullock a écrit : > Hi all, > > This is more of philosophical question than anything else. I'm curious to > know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd. Why not have implicit control > -> signal conversion everywhere it is possible? > > For example why not allow this? > > |2( |3( > | | > [+~ ] I think this is the same than : [2 ( [3 ( | | [sig~] [sig~] \ / \ / [+~] The messages are send every 64 samples (if i am right ?) So, in this exemple, if you send it to [sig~] or [+~], this should be the same thing. ++
Jack > > Jamie > > -- > http://www.jamiebullock.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
