On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Jamie Bullock <ja...@postlude.co.uk> wrote:
> > OK, just tried my Edirol FA-66 firewire interface. CPU does indeed drop to > 12%. > > Still that's a ridiculous overhead for simply talking to the audio > hardware. > > A profile would show that the DSP functions are no longer taking CPU time. The remaining 10% is the blocking. > Does that mean that Mathieu was wrong earlier about the PABLIO interface > not causing any significant overhead? > I don't know much about PortAudio and PABLIO. The blocking call probably does come from how Pd uses PA.
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
