how about removing the expXXX numbers, and use only concrete floats? or is
there any software reason that doesn't let that happen?
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Derek Holzer wrote:
And keep in mind that sound quality goes down as file size goes up.
This is because of the interpolation. You might do better cutting your
file up and putting it into several different arrays.
Oh, and isn't it the case that [tabread~] 0.42 has an extra inlet for
the purpose of getting more precision ? The read point is now relative
to a message-rate setting.
If you have to play a very large file in RAM, you can do it by emptying
your signal-rate counter into a message-rate counter that takes care of
the big digits while the signal-rate counter keeps on taking care of the
small digits and fractions. (do you want an example ?)
_______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------------- Aix-en-Provence
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Friedenstr. 58
10249 Berlin (Deutschland)
Tel +49 30 42020091 | Mob +49 162 6843570
Studio +49 30 69509190
jmmmp...@googlemail.com | skype: jmmmpjmmmp
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
