Lol, I meant to say "next" piece (silly android voice recognition)...
Ivica Ico Bukvic <i...@vt.edu> wrote: >Great suggestion! That might work quite nicely. We only have to make sure for >legacy purposes that wherever in the old code this variable is being checked >that it can gracefully handle values less than 0. > >That said, my top priority as of right now is further testing current code as >well as continuing to work on my neck piece. Beyond that I would like to make >all iem objects resizable via GUI, revamp the to-front and to-back algorithm >so that it does not rely upon undo, followed by an "infinite" undo, and then >tooltips, improved color picker, improve upon the tidy algorithm, and then >weed through the documentation and externals and only keep those that are well >maintained and are not redundant. Your suggestion might fit nicely somewhere >inside here as well. > >I would also like to see Qt-ified (or better yet juce-ified) version of the >whole thing. This will however have to wait. > > Long story short it might be a while before I make the next big push. In the > meantime, as always, contributions will be most welcome provided they do not > break the backwards compatibility. > >Cheers! > >Ico _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
