--- On Wed, 2/2/11, Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca> wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca>
> Subject: Re: [PD] how can I clear [vd~]
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" <jancs...@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "Ingo Scherzinger" <i...@miamiwave.com>, pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Wednesday, February 2, 2011, 6:22 AM
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jonathan Wilkes
> wrote:
>
> > Would the following do the same thing as a "clear"
> message?
>
> If you don't need change the amount of delay while using
> it.
Ah, right.
>
> It works because [delay] doesn't keep a queue of unsent
> bangs, it just forgets them, while [pipe] does make a queue
> (which wouldn't work in that circumstance).
Yep.
>
> If you wanted to support variable delay (in the manner that
> [delread~] does) you'd need to use a [line] with a [<] to
> figure out when to turn the delread~ back on.
>
> The other difference is that instead of sending a message
> to a single [delwrite~], you have to modify all [delread~]s
> that happen to read that delay-buffer.
That's definitely a burden.
Did you add your patch to the tracker?
-Jonathan
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ----
> Villeray, Montréal, QC
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
