Why do we have to put dll into windows/system32 instead of pd/bin? I don't like to move things to system32, this afternoon i had to fix a problem involved by a library sitting there.
----- "Mathieu Bouchard" <ma...@artengine.ca> a écrit : > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, patko wrote: > > > This should be gridflow 9.12, I didn't heard about a 9.13 version, > also > > HC told me to put the link on puredata.info but I don't understand > how > > this plone site is working, I can't post anything without getting > > errors. > > Ok, I finally tagged GridFlow 9.13 and made a package : > > http://gridflow.ca/download/packages/gridflow-9.13-win32-i386.zip > > Unlike GridFlow 9.12, which was built using gcc4, this is built with > gcc3, > just like GridFlow 9.8 and 9.7, and hopefully, it will be the last one > to > be built with gcc3. > > Yes, my Windows partition is back, as mysteriously as it was gone. > > If there's any reason why I should rebuild 9.13 with gcc4, I could be > > doing it. > > GEM support still doesn't work on win32, and according to Johannes, > will > be hard to get to work. > > I still haven't added X11 support in this build. > > Can we make sure that it can be loaded by everybody, and [gf/gl] > works ? > After that, I'll make an official announcement. (Well, when the other > > packages are done as well) > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, > QC -- Patrice Colet _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list