>yes, this is known. By known you mean.. Is it on the bug tracker already?
When such things are discovered (and by things I mean issues), shouldn't they be documented inside the help patches? It helps a lot those getting inside pd. Best, pedro On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:44 PM, cyrille henry <c...@chnry.net> wrote: > hello, > > yes, this is known. > you have to explicitly send the loadbang, like in this patch, using your > exemple. > (don't know about initbang, i don't use it) > c > > > Le 19/02/2011 20:33, John Harrison a écrit : > >> is it correct behavior that loadbang will not be called when it is part of >> a dynamically created object? See attached. If you load test-do, it will >> create an instance of test when you click on the message. Test should print >> loadbang and initbang, but it only prints initbang. >> >> >> >> -- >> John >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- Pedro Lopes (MSc) contact: pedro.lo...@ist.utl.pt website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes / http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ | http://twitter.com/plopesresearch
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
