On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Joe White <[email protected]> wrote: > P.s. We're in the process of creating some online documentation (similar to > Max) for all the objects in the library. It'd be great to get some feedback > once it's finished.
Hi Joe, No, I found the problem -- the issue is that the u_dispatch abstraction doesn't work with symbols. If I'd looked closely at the help file, I would have noticed the prominent comment to that effect. ;) This actually turns out to be a fairly significant issue, because I'd ideally like to pass different arrays into the abstraction. Suggestions? Maybe there's another way to pass in the symbol for the array, like multiplexing as an argument on instantiating those patchers? Or maybe u_dispatch $0 symbol is fixable? (And yes, I'm happy to have a look at the documentation, or even contribute prior to it being completely finished ... editing is kinda one of the things I do, and it's the least I can do to give back to this amazing library!) Peter _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
