Hi Phil, if they'll always play from the beginning and the only control you need is amplitude, then I would try readsf~.
J On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Phil Stone <pkst...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > OK, this was probably too broad a way to pose this. Let me try it this way: > I'm not concerned with looping, re-sampling or sample-rate changing. I > simply want a low-latency trigger of a sound file from an incoming event. > The file(s) may, however, be quite large. > > So, is a phasor-scanned [tabread4~] the best way to go about this? Will > memory management become an issue if I have 44 or 88 of these large samples > in memory at once? > > thanks, > > Phil > > > On 3/24/11 11:30 AM, Phil Stone wrote: >> >> Hello collective PD mind, >> >> Despite having worked with PD for years, I've never used it as a sample >> player. I have a project coming up where I will need to build a bank of >> MIDI-keyboard-triggered samples to play in real-time, with velocity >> sensitivity and one sample per key. Rather than reinvent the wheel, is there >> something someone has already done along this line? If not, can anyone give >> me a basic outline from which I can start? >> >> >> Phil Stone >> www.pkstonemusic.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- Jaime E Oliver LR www.jaimeoliver.pe 858 750 0924 (cel) 858 202 1522 (home) _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list