Hey, many thanks to all for such great tricks&hacks!
The trick to route messages to a named subpatch turned out to be a chicken-egg 
problem if the subpatches are to be built dynamically as I need...thanks for 
the nice idea anyway :)though "obsolete" (?) that [namecanvas] really solved my 
problem. Hope it won't be deprecated, as it seems the only way to access 
individual abstraction instances through the pd-msg system. Otherwise a 
(better?) workaround should be provided.Btw where is this iemguts lib?


Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 13:24:22 +0200
From: funssee...@gmail.com
To: cla...@goto10.org
CC: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] msg to abstractions



2011/5/5 Claude Heiland-Allen <cla...@goto10.org>

On 05/05/11 11:56, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:


On 05/05/11 10:31, Jeppi Jeppi wrote:


Adding prefix to the abstraction names is not elegant, as that would

require previously creating n abstractions, named [1_boo] , [2_boo]

and so on...clumsy




Just remembered there is a "loader plugin" out there somewhere that creates new 
abstractions from a template for any unknown names - not sure where to find it 
though IOhannes might know?

iemguts/autoabstraction?

Funs



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list                                     
    
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to