On 08/28/2011 06:41 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: > >> Gem currently does not compile with mingw (see recent postings on >> gem-dev@), but it would be a nice feature to have for 0.94 (help would >> be appreciated; hint, hint :-)) > > It's not that I would like to have the option of compiling Gem in MinGW, > it's that I would like the default builds of Gem to be able to > communicate with GridFlow. So it's either that Gem binaries for Windows > all use MinGW, or that a workaround is created so that anything that > communicates with Gem can do it without being compiled in MSVC. > > Otherwise, it would mean that GEM users who want to try GF have to > reinstall a different GEM than default just to have something that runs > with MinGW.
i'm aware of the problem. however, the problem is the solution. gfmasr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
