Haha, I'll pretend I understand this Andy :) On 28 August 2011 18:29, Andy Farnell <padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk> wrote:
> > I think reasonable suggestions might be welcome. > > Some say the sulphur fumes, screams and maniacal laughter emanating > from Martin and Joe's subterranean laboratory beneath the opera house > catacombs is too intimidating. But I've heard that mortals making offerings > have been spared. > > Occasionally. > > On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:04:44 -0400 (EDT) > Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca> wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Andy Farnell wrote: > > > > > If the developer exhibits a capacity for purposefulness, couldn't that > > > same a sense of purpose be used to undo a mistake? > > > > Well, the developer would have to think of those things as mistakes > first, > > and also, to think of vanilla's ways as being the solutions. When the > idea > > of «cleaner design than vanilla's» is to use a big if else if else if > else > > if else if else if instead of the constructor table and instead of every > > method table, does it make it look like you or I has any business trying > > to change the mind of the author, and does that look easier than (!!!) > > submitting patches to Miller ? > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC > > > -- > Andy Farnell <padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk> > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list