Haha, I'll pretend I understand this Andy :)

On 28 August 2011 18:29, Andy Farnell <padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk> wrote:

>
> I think reasonable suggestions might be welcome.
>
> Some say the sulphur fumes, screams and maniacal laughter emanating
> from Martin and Joe's subterranean laboratory beneath the opera house
> catacombs is too intimidating. But I've heard that mortals making offerings
> have been spared.
>
> Occasionally.
>
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 13:04:44 -0400 (EDT)
> Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Andy Farnell wrote:
> >
> > > If the developer exhibits a capacity for purposefulness, couldn't that
> > > same a sense of purpose be used to undo a mistake?
> >
> > Well, the developer would have to think of those things as mistakes
> first,
> > and also, to think of vanilla's ways as being the solutions. When the
> idea
> > of «cleaner design than vanilla's» is to use a big if else if else if
> else
> > if else if else if instead of the constructor table and instead of every
> > method table, does it make it look like you or I has any business trying
> > to change the mind of the author, and does that look easier than (!!!)
> > submitting patches to Miller ?
> >
> >   _______________________________________________________________________
> > | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
>
>
> --
> Andy Farnell <padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to