-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-31 16:11, Michael Zacherl. wrote: > despite what IOhannes pointed out (and I still agree with him)
i do not doubt that there are many use cases where it is indeed a better idea to avoid connections in favour of an accessing memory by name. i only wanted to point out that it many cases it is not. ghmsd IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5fR2gACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSU5gCeKKvqh17jnKrb887TMZMuGbyG TWQAnAv9Ym9wthVqXni77aljNiRJPmN5 =0Jt3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
