On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> How does the cpu usage in my demo compare to your patch where you use > a radiobutton? Here's a cpu load comparison of objects dragged continuously (on intel mac 2GHz): polygon in movable_box2.pd: 23 % polygon in 07.sequencer.pd (help browser): 16% radiobutton in moving_objects.pd: 12 % regular Pd slider: 13 % 2D geo in a gem window: 2.5% Your polygon method is plain vanilla Pd and that makes it attractive for a widely shared Pd patch. No risk of broken dependencies. But I am afraid it is too cpu-intensive, particularly on Windows. Thanks for sharing the idea though, it is inspiring. Katja _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list