Le 2011-11-05 à 22:32:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
On Nov 5, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
GF supports 3 different ABIs of GEM, but now there's a new ABI that it
isn't compatible with yet. It's the 3rd different GEM ABI to be
labelled «0.93» so far. (but I don't remember which versions of GEM are
bundled with Extended).
Is that a Pd-extended issue or a Gem issue?
I mention one of the GEM linkage problems as a different example of the
same kind of problem.
I don't really know much about Gem's guts or C++ linking. I was under
the impression this issue is related to C++ name mangling.
Well, I have two problems with linking with GEM :
One is that the GEM ABI keeps changing (struct fields get added and
deleted in header files needed to support GEM).
The other is that VisualC++'s ABI is not compatible with GCC's C++ ABI,
and that makes it impossible to use [#to_pix] and [#from_pix] on Windows.
It's both the name mangling and the exception-handling, but I got stuck at
the name-mangling part.
______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
