----- Original Message ----- > From: Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca> > To: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> > Cc: pd-list@iem.at > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:02 PM > Subject: Re: [PD] "get" method for Pd > > Le 2011-11-21 à 12:58:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : >> while i'm all for "one objectclass per functionality", and > for >> establishing a single idiom (at least, per "objectclass family") > - and >> thus think i'm with hans also, i still don't see any point in >> "masquerading as a single class". >> what makes the name [list foo] any better than [listfoo]?
Yeahreallythey'rebothequallyclearespeciallyformusicianswhoaren'tprogrammers. Justlikereadingamusicscore--whitespacedoesn'taffectreadabilitythatmuch. > > It's a form of namespacing. Hyphens work, too, but two words against each other are less readable. -Jonathan > > Ask Hans what makes the name ::pdtk_canvas::pdtk_canvas_popup any better than > just pdtk_canvas_popup... I don't get it either, and on top of that, I > don't get the point of the the repetitive repetition of of pdtk_canvas > pdtk_canvas. > >> objects with "proper" names - that don't involve > "mummmers" - can still >> share the same help-patch (if needed). > > (What are you talking about ?) > > ______________________________________________________________________ > | Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list