On 1/10/12, Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com> wrote: > sorry, what dont you get?
I guess the shifter+mixer makes sense for the harmonizer--I just don't see why it's running when I just want to hear the pitch shifting effect by itself. Is that just a mistake? This is unrelated, but when I use [openpanel] under linux, it only lets me select *.pd files. I guess I'll mess with readsf~ by passing messages so I can try it out with some sound files. > > you're supposed to first hear the beatings and then the shift up anyway. > > well, let me try with some oscilattors myself, that should be fun > > see ya > > > 2012/1/9 Charles Henry <czhe...@gmail.com> > >> Hey Alex >> >> I'm just trying this out. I didn't have a sound file I particularly >> wanted to try, so I just plugged in an osc~, and what I found on the >> output: a mixture of the original tone with the shifted one. >> >> So, the shifted tone was clearly audible, but as I shifted the >> frequency, I could hear first the beating of the tones then two tones. >> >> And upon reading into the patch, that's clearly what you're doing in a >> subpatch, but I don't get why? >> >> Chuck >> >> On 1/9/12, Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Folks, >> > >> > working with these phase vocoder stuff, I thought I'd try and do a >> > simple >> > shifter/harmonizer with it once and for all. The phase vocoder shifter I >> > found in pdmtl doesn't work as a harmonizer, and the latency was pretty >> > high and not constant, so I did this. It's all as a Vanila abstraction! >> > >> > I have 2 short buffers (arrays) and do crossfade between them, I got >> > some >> > phase issues trying out and building it, but they now seem reasonably >> fine. >> > >> > I just did this, so I should work more on it to make it more stable and >> > robust. I'm sure there are some bugs around, and it's still very dirty >> and >> > needs code cleaning. Maybe I should try and implement it with delay >> > lines >> > as in pdmtl, hmmm, I guess it'd be better, right? Hmm... Later on when I >> > have the time... >> > >> > Anyway, this goes back to the Pd Shifting thread I started here a while >> > ago. I really like the quality of the phase vocoder. Somehow I don't get >> > interested so much on other techniques and such. Yes, I assume there are >> > some advantages out there, so what exactly would I be missing? >> > >> > Well, Check this thing I did out, see what you think, let's talk some >> more >> > about pitch shifting.... >> > >> > get it here: http://sites.google.com/site/porres/pvoc-shifter.zip >> > >> > I wish to officially release it along with some other tools I'm building >> > for my PhD, soon to be over... >> > >> > by the way, I see this object is finally available >> > http://www.katjaas.nl/pitchshift/pitchshift.html need to try it out. >> > >> > cheers alex >> > >> > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list