Make sure you run the most recent version of pdl2ork when you fire it up next.
There have been a lot of speedups since then.
-Jonathan
>________________________________
> From: Billy Stiltner <billy.stilt...@gmail.com>
>To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com>
>Cc: pd-list <pd-list@iem.at>
>Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 6:30 PM
>Subject: Re: [PD] GUI and DSP
>
>
>I don't remember its been about a year or so since I ran it. Was the same
>thing that was slow with the other slow versions of pd I guess. Next time
>Ifire up the machine it's on I'll try to run it. I remember that max with
>juce on windows would drop out with the x.fm patch if I played a bunch of
>notes.with a 256b block pd would drop out with polyphony as well but I could
>run with a 64b block and GEM slinging polygons all over the place but the
>juce examples were slow. With a lot of overhead. I might not have had enough
>memory 1GB.
>
>
>
>On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>________________________________
>>> From: Billy Stiltner <billy.stilt...@gmail.com>
>>>To: Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca>
>>>Cc: Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com>; "pd-list@iem.at List"
>>><pd-list@iem.at>
>>>Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:03 AM
>>
>>>Subject: Re: [PD] GUI and DSP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>When I tried JUCE on windows it was slow. pretty but slow. Same with pdlork
>>>on linux.
>>
>>What was slow with pd-l2ork?
>>
>>-Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
