Le 2012-03-04 à 03:10:00, Billy Stiltner a écrit :
What we need is flat address space without the overhead of GDS segment
sorcery.
What's GDS ? Is that a Windows-only thing ?
It's pretty bad to be able to delete a list of a list of pointers to
objects that deletes itself before it deletes itself in a polymorphic
virtual destructor. ;)
Any language with sufficient power will have to allow the user to screw
up. C gives you the power to decide of your own allocation duration (after
malloc, how long before you free). But C also gives you the power to write
your own automatic-free, or use someone else's. C++ makes it easier in
some ways (ref-counting can become almost completely implicit).
C++ is great but it is much easier to keep up with pointers in c.
Please don't make it look like you didn't try C++ ;) In C++ you have a
larger number of constructs you can use ; in C you have to reuse the same
constructs in more different ways before you can get to the same solution.
Any C++ programme could have been written using C by the means of more
funny tricks and longer, more redundant code. The length and redundancy is
sometimes all it takes to make bugs harder to find.
c is just like c++ without the confusion you can work yourself into a
pointer to a function is a pointer to a function
I can't parse your sentence... sorry
and if yo look at the assembly language there aint nothing wrong with
using struct instead of class.
In C++, struct and class are near-synonymous. All the OOP features are
available with the struct keyword. In fact, you never need the class
keyword, if you don't want it to appear in your source code.
it's all code an data when its running.
Even when not running, if you ask me...
the differences in the output are going to be more than likely caused by
leaky capacitors and noisy fans or 2 coils of wire too close together.
The differences in the output between asm, C and C++ is more likely going
to be about which categories of bugs, in which amounts, will be found
between the chair and the keyboard.
And I'm not talking about Cimex Lectularius.
______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
