----- Original Message ----- > From: Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca> > To: Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsut...@gmail.com> > Cc: pd-list@iem.at > Sent: Monday, March 5, 2012 2:22 PM > Subject: Re: [PD] [OT] Music Notation in linux > > Le 2012-03-05 à 19:58:00, Lorenzo Sutton a écrit : > >> It can be dangerous/misleading to extract the general rule from one single, > very specific example like this, and then re-apply it to a totally different > domain/example. > > Yes, but then, the reasoning that you stated is not what you actually meant. > You're not trying to say that it doesn't make sense to use something > that is primarily a typesetting system, to do midi output. It may be because > Lilypond in particular is bad at this task in particular, but you already are > generalising by calling it « a midi creator » and « a typesetting system » > and > that a fact about the latter in general justifies a statement about the > former > in general.
I gave you a link to show what Lilypond _actually_ does. The \articulation command just changes the input for all articulations that can be simulated by altering the actual note values. So for staccato, a note value is changed to a smaller note value plus a rest, legato is changed to two voices that slightly overlap*, and so on. Of course this is clunky, because if you want to look at the score and listen to the MIDI output you need to render twice-- once using the \articulation command for the MIDI output, and another without it to get the score looking as it normally would (though I may be missing some command that will automate this). Without the \articulation command, you can get basic MIDI output for things like dynamic changes and markings, and tempo changes: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/creating-midi-files * A former piano teacher of mine termed this technique "California legato"-- that is, playing one note, then playing the next while lazily releasing the first note. This was a derogatory term, meant to chide the performer for going after easy note-to-note connections at the expense of melodic clarity. (Similar to keeping the pedal fully down through changes in harmony.) -Jonathan > > I'm not saying that I really expressed myself well in yesterday's > reply... It was a bad way to put it. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > | Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
