Hi Rough approach : you could compare your array with the reference array by playing once from time to time the two simultaneously, sum (the first) and (the second *-1) and check with env~ that you still get nothing at the output.
my 5*10^-7 cents. On 07/03/2012 09:55, Roman Haefeli wrote: > Hi all > > Is there a way to be reliably notified when a table/array changes? My > hope is that I don't know of some hidden feature. Is there any? > > It's easy to catch messages sent to [s arrayname]. However, it's not so > easy when data is written through [tabwrite arrayname] or [tabwrite~ > arrayname] or if the data is drawn manually. > > My current solution is quite a CPU hog: The whole table is scanned in > periodic intervals and compared to a reference table, so that any > difference will be caught. Of course, this solution comes with a latency > (it's a trade-off between avoiding latency and saving CPU cycles). > Probably, it could be a wee bit less CPU hungry to make the comparison > in the audio domain instead of the message domain, but still it's > work-around. > > Is there a real solution for this around? > > Roman > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list