I don't need to access properties menu, this part of the patch should never be in edit mode, so your solution is so far so good.
Colet Patrice ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Quim Llimona" <lemonz...@gmail.com> > À: "Patrice Colet" <colet.patr...@free.fr> > Cc: "pd-list" <pd-list@iem.at> > Envoyé: Mercredi 20 Juin 2012 08:44:14 > Objet: Re: [PD] send a message with IEM/bang > > Hi, > > Try making an abstraction with graph-on-parent enabled and make it > the same > size as the bang. Then you can tweak whatever you want inside, use > creation > arguments (even on the bang)... I'm using this trick to do > synchronized GUI > objects. The only problem is you can't access the properties menu, > but you > can still modify the bang if you send it messages like size, color... > It works great for me! Also, if you make the graph-on-parent 2 pixels > wider > you will get a kind of "bold" bang, which I find very cool. > > Cheers, > > Quim > > > 2012/6/20 Patrice Colet <colet.patr...@free.fr> > > > Hello, > > > > in a dynamic GUI patching project, I'm using a bang that would > > destroy > > itself and some other objects that come along with it. > > [bang] is dynamically contructed then bang would need a callback > > abstraction, or a 'settable receive'. > > > > > > Maybe such thing would be possible by using a slider instead of a > > bang, > > and setting max and min value to a number attributed to this > > graphical > > element, but it makes more sense graphicaly to use a bang for that, > > we know > > that bang doesn't output anything else than 'bang', so my question > > is: why > > not telling [bang] to output a message, and using only 'bang' for > > default? > > > > Colet Patrice > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list