Thanks for the clarification, I though I read that a RT-Kernel would
improve on the pureData responsiveness for the raspberry pi, good to
know that it's probably not needed.
On 09/11/2012 06:59 PM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:42:03 +0200
From: Charles Goyard<c...@fsck.fr>
Subject: Re: [PD] another day's raspberry pi experiences
To:pd-list@iem.at
Message-ID:<20120911154203.GB2645@tip>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Geoffroy wrote:
> I read that a real time kernel would be quite useful on a raspberry pi
> for pure data, and I wonder if this project would help:
Maybe there's a confusion between real-time priority (standard kernel)
and hard real-time (RT kernel).
Hard real-time is more for really time-critical stuff down to
microseconds, like driving a CNC or stuff. Having a real-time task
running can feel like your computer is super-slow. It's more made for
single task processing.
As far as pd is concerned, I'd say real-time priority is
enough, and is configured with /etc/security/limits.conf.
++
-- Charlot
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
