> > speaking of "#A": would it add any incompatibility, if the > array-loading mechanism could be extended to _all_ objects. > e.g. if an array is saved in-patch, we get something like > > <snip> > #X array array1 3 float 3; > #A 0 -0.5 -0.3 -0.1; > #X array array2 3 float 3; > #A 0 0.5 0.3 0.1; > </snip> > > after the 1st line (that creates 'array1'), the receiver "#A" is bound > to this newly created array. in the 2nd line a message is sent to > array1 via this receiver. > in the 3rd line (creating 'array2'), the "#A" is unbound from "array1" > and bound to "array2". > > it would be great if this could be extended to any object: > <snip> > #X obj 100 100 print; > #A foo bar; > #X obj 200 200 f; > </snip> > would send [foo bar( to [print] before all loadbangs and stuff, even > before [f] is created. > yep... I just hit this fixing up the new "text" object and have fixed the source to make this work for any object - search for #A in the newest git.
cheers M _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
