On 10/06/2012 12:25 PM, Ed Kelly wrote:
> True, but looking outside of the scope of audio for a second...
my point was, that there is a reason for specialized objects, even if
they are written in an obscure compiled language like C.
i wouldn't want to do anything requiring low latencies (like audio) with
PdOS.
>
> The point I am trying to make is that Pd should be able to read and write any
> file, with interpretation of the data implemented on an ad-hoc basis. In this
> way, mrpeach/binfile is incredibly useful. Obviously non-audio files will
> mostly generate noise if played back as audio, but Pd provides so many other
> ways in which data can be sonified, visualized etc...
>
[binfile] has many uses, and i'm very glad that it is there.
e.g. the [srtfile] object i mentioned in the other thread ("[text3d] &
video subtitling in Pd") is really a Pd-patch around [binfile].
there is still little merit in implementing [mp3write~] as patch,
besides pedagogy and ego-boosty.
mfgasrd
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
