Hi, > > I'd get into writing a helper object to keep track of things - written in C - > because this does make the process of dynamic patching a lot easier. You can > encode object types and connections in such an object I guess - this is a > bit like writing an object that makes a map of Pd patches, and you could > encode the connections as well. Perhaps iemguts does this although I don't > know it that well. (it's the patch itself we're trying to query after all - > what objects, in what order, and how are they connected, and in what order). >
i guess this is also just what dyn~ (http://puredata.info/Members/thomas/dynext) tries to do. gr~~~ _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
