-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-08 19:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > No, that's not the case. I've actually never really touched the > example patch. Anyway, my actual worry is why these objects behave > the way they do in my patch, which is really strange. In order to > see what's wrong I opened earlier versions of the patch I'm working > on (which were using [link] and [mass] fine) and they also show the > same strange behavior. It looks like a bug hit it all of a > sudden.. I've attached an earlier version which is smaller, if > anyone's willing to check. Physical modelling is inside [pd > object1], [pd object2] etc. inside [pd coordinates1].. It used to > be that the first time you hit the bangs, the rectangles wouldn't > behave as expected (in the gem window), but after that everything > was working pretty stably. Hope someone can help. >
i haven't really tried to understand your patch, but you will most likely find, that [trigger] will fix most of your problems. **never ever connect one message outlet to multiple message inlets; always use [trigger] in such cases** fgmasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDsZIkACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSLjACfSdq5S3d5gfewhHix9ZOJhLJ2 ftEAoLwwKnhAX68HaLw1qItWOW3zl6a6 =O2gO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list