Yes, I only want to launch Pd from Python and the status of some objects in return, so nothing too critical.
I'll try the OSC example. Cheers, Pierre. 2013/1/21 padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk <padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk> > ** > > With popen you'll quickly discover the joys of unix buffers, queueing > and all the reasons libPd was invented :) > > Probably a frustrating journey if you want to do any kind of time > critical musical control this way. If transferring bulk data, or > launching > Pd instances for control by other sources is your aim, then > it will be okay. > > > On 21 January 2013 at 14:42 Pierre Massat <pimas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear List, > > I've been working a lot with Python and Pd lately, and i would like to > have better means of communication between the two. > I know next to nothing about inter-process communication, I know nothing > about FUDI (except that it's the protocol used by pdsend and pdreceive), > and I have no idea what pdreceive was originally designed for. I've only > used the subprocess (formerly popen) module in python, but i don't know how > to use it with streams of messages coming from the standard output of a > running process. > I don't want to use libpd for now because i only need to send and receive > simple messages between Python and Pd. > > Can someone please provide a few hints ? > > Cheers! > > Pierre. > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list