On 02/05/2013 03:05 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2013-02-04 22:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> Currently that is implemented like this in the Debian packages: > >> /usr/lib/pd (libraries shared among all Pd distros) > > small amendment: i think this should be explicitely only for libraries > that are binary compatible with pd-vanilla. judging from a recent thread, > this would rule out pd-l2ork. > >> /usr/lib/puredata (Pd-vanilla) /usr/lib/pd-extended /usr/lib/pd-l2ork > > > and i want to stress (in support of the above layout), that we/you > shouldn't try to invent yet another fiel system layout, but rather stick > to what we already have (mostly in debian) > > fgamsdr IOhannes
Strongly agree on both counts! .hc _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
