I don't use any of this stuff, but I'm happy help make it easy to use plugins. I imagine that pix_freeframe and pix_frei0r search the standard Pd path for plugins, or if not, could be made to without too much work.
What are the particular issues there? .hc On 02/07/2013 01:02 PM, me.grimm wrote: > if we take into account: > pix_freeframe (it would be nice/easy if when initiaized it looked in > pd's standard path for a "freeframe" folder maybe?) > pix_frei0r (same deal) > glsl effects (i never did quite figure out an easy way to chain effects) > > but other than effects that could be accomplished with these, what else? > > im curious because i have only used pidip a couple of times but have > always been able to find a way to do what i desired in gem... somehow. > > m > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Pagano, Patrick > <p...@digitalworlds.ufl.edu> wrote: >> It has a ton of effects that Gem does not have >> There is not really a comparison. Gem does not compete so to speak because >> Gem does other things supremely well >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of >> me.grimm >> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:08 AM >> To: Hans-Christoph Steiner >> Cc: pd-list@iem.at; John Harrison >> Subject: Re: [PD] pidip >> >> i would wonder. what does pidip got that gem does not? >> and cant those things that it got that gem does not be added to gem via >> original gpl code? >> why have more than one vid lib >> at least in pdx >> >> m >> >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not aware of that. Perhaps you're thinking about how pidip should >>> all be GPL, since it is based on GPL code. The GPL does not allow >>> more license restrictions, and the pidip license does just that. So >>> that means that the GPL code included in pidip is still GPL, but the >>> code that sevy contributed is under his license, and those two >>> licenses conflict. So basically, pidip is not legal to distribute in >>> binary form because of the conflicting licenses within itself. >>> >>> Whether you choose to ignore copyright law is your decision. I am >>> personally fine with people distributing pidip as its own thing and >>> using it with any of my code as long as: >>> >>> 1) the pidip distro is clearly marked as non-free >>> 2) pidip is not bundled with my GPLed code (i.e. as part of >>> pd-extended, pd-l2ork, etc.) >>> >>> .hc >>> >>> On 02/06/2013 11:44 AM, John Harrison wrote: >>>> I thought there was an earlier version of PiDiP which was and could >>>> be included with Pd-extended because it was released under an >>>> acceptable/compatible license? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner >>>> <h...@at.or.at>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just be aware that pidip is not free software because it has clauses >>>>> in its license that restrict what it can be used for. Including >>>>> pidip in your package means your package can no longer be legally >>>>> distributed as binaries since the pidip license terms conflict with the >>>>> GPL license terms. >>>>> >>>>> .hc >>>>> >>>>> On 02/06/2013 09:27 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: >>>>>> I just finished cleaning up both pdp and pidip libs to be fully >>>>> auto-buildable >>>>>> as part of pd-l2ork (including freenect, artoolkit, opencv, etc.). >>>>>> There >>>>> are a >>>>>> number of packages you need to install from launchpad in order to >>>>>> get >>>>> all the >>>>>> externals to build. Stay tuned for the next release coming soon >>>>>> with >>>>> these >>>>>> enhancements... >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >> >> -- >> ____________________ >> m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m. >> megr...@gmail.com >> _________________________________ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list