Le 09/02/2013 21:11, Roman Haefeli a écrit :
On Sam, 2013-02-09 at 16:41 +0100, Cyrille Henry wrote:


Yeah, right. But you can add the values up to get rotation (of course,
it's always rotation relative to itself, which will obviously drift from
reality over time).
yep.
drift usually make this useless.


in theory (with infinite acurate sensors, no drift etc), you have to
do a feedback loop (using gemlist_info), so that the current rotation
is modify by the sensors value.
(rotation did not sums up)

...parsing solution .... beep...... stack overflow (in my head)!

You mean you add each increment (gyro measurement) to the rotation
separately, then get the orientation with gem_list info, add the next
increment to the orientation, get orientation again, add increment etc?
Can you cast that into a little Gem example patch, if it is not too much
trouble?

yes.
see attachment.
cheers
c


Roman



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Attachment: gyro_2_absolute.pd
Description: application/puredata

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to