IOhannes just confirmed that the pix_multiblob code has changed and thus broke the patch. Since i don't have the git version compiled I can't test here. So that is a confirmed Gem problem. I don't see the point to work with that object any more, now that I know that the new version breaks backward compatibility. I want to be able to make a patch that works with whatever gem version : (
Am 10.06.2013 um 18:58 schrieb Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com>: > Bonjour Antoine et merci beacuoup. > Thanks a lot for testing this. A change in behavior between Gem release and > git is probably not intended, so that's where I hope IOhannes can have a look > into. > > max > > Am 10.06.2013 um 17:34 schrieb Antoine Villeret <antoine.ville...@gmail.com>: > >> hi, >> >> it works on my machine (Ubuntu 64bit) with pd 0.44-extended-20130528 (Gem >> 93.3) >> and I can also confirm it works with latest pd vanilla and Gem 0.93.3 >> and it doesn't with the latest Gem from Git but I don't know why yet... >> >> + >> a >> >> -- >> do it yourself >> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >> >> >> 2013/6/6 Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com> >> >> Am 06.06.2013 um 18:18 schrieb Jack <j...@rybn.org>: >>> Hello Max, >>> >>> I have the same results than Antoine. >>> A screenshot is attached. >>> Configuration : >>> Ubuntu 13.04, Pd 0.44.3, Gem ver: 0.93.git 374f713. >> >> I just tested it with another machine >> Windows Pd-ext 0.43 / Gem 0.92 >> Windows Pd-ext 0.44 / Gem 0.93.3 >> both work as expected. >> >> I'm wondering if it really could be your unreleased Gem version. Could you >> try a precompiled stock version instead? _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list