Ah, that's much simpler than what I was thinking. How do you always do it Roman? :D
On Aug 7, 2013, at 9:44 AM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote: > From: Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [PD] routeOSC - dynamic routing? > Date: August 7, 2013 7:16:13 AM EDT > To: pd-list@iem.at > > > On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 02:15 -0400, pured...@11h11.com wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i have more than 50 OSC messages to [routeOSC], i would like to avoid >> having to cut and paste & click and drag. what are my options here? >> >> [routeOSC /knob1 /knob2 ...] >> | | >> [s $0-knob1] [s $0-knob2] >> >> thanks > > Instead of routing with [routeOSC], you could use the last address field > directly as the send address: > > [/knobs/knob1 23( > | > [routeOSC /knobs/ > | > [list] > | > [; $1 $2( > > As an alternative to the ;-messagebox with hard-coded number of > elements, you could employ a settable [send] > > Roman -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list