i spent quite a long time being bounced from department to department with apple, trying to find out if i could use expr in IOS apps, and they never gave me a definitive answer. Basically they told me i'd have to hire a lawyer to find out :p
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 10/02/2013 08:35 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > My approach with PdParty so far is: > > - GPL source code is incompatible with the Apple App Store due to the > static linking requirement which means you cannot distribute GPL libs as > dynamic libs which can be updated or replaced by the user > > - GPL patches are fine, they are text files which are not compiled into > your app binary so can be freely replaced, I expose all of the GPL patches > I use to the user so they can modify or update them to satisfy the > distribution requirement of the GPL > > - I leave out [expr] & [expr~] for now. The license in the expr src > folder is LGPL, but the license in the source headers is GPL and the > following is printed to console when first loading the external: "expr, > expr~, fexpr~ version 0.4 under GNU General Public License ". I will leave > it out until those parts of the code are explicitly changed. If this has > already happened, then we need to merge in those changes to libpd. So far, > as Miller suggests, I've been replacing [expr] with regular math objects. > > > And make sure that all the authors sign off on that license change. > > -Jonathan > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list