Thank you very much! WIll try this solution out :)
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu> wrote: > Just play it (tabplay~) into the other one (tabrecord~). You can do this > at many times 'normal' speed if you want by putting it in a subpatch > with a high sample rate. > > cheers > Miller > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:58:22AM -0400, Johann Diedrick wrote: > > Hi Pd list- > > > > I have a question about the object arraycopy. It works great, but I'm > > copying an array with 13230000 points (5 minutes of audio at 44,100 hz) > and > > it seems very slow. In particular, my patch seems to "lock" up for about > > 2-3 seconds when making the copy. The audio stops for those 2 seconds, > and > > the UI seems to lock up. While this isn't a huge game changer for my > > purposes, I wish there was an alternative for this. Is there a better > > solution for making a copy on the fly for an array this big that is > faster, > > doesn't lock up the patch or kill the audio for that time period? Maybe > > there is a threaded solution? > > > > I'd love to hear any thoughts on this! > > > > Thanks so much, > > > > -Johann > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list