Le 21/08/2014 17:47, Miller Puckette a écrit :
Correct - but if some keyboard actually sent a note-off message with a nonzero
velocity a Pd patch wouldn't easily be able to get that value. I don't think
it's important at all (and neither do I think the limitations in oscparse will
ever matter) - but of course I could be wrong, since my experience with osc is
smaller than tiny. I've never used the protocol at all. (I think FUDI is
much cleaner :)
yes, i prefer fudi to.
but on small hardware, like the one i was developing 12 years ago, OSC was
faster.
not because of the reduced bandwidth, but because of the conversion between
ascii character to float.
but that time is over now, and this conversion should be quicker even on
"small" hardware.
cheers
c
M
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:42:42PM +0200, Cyrille Henry wrote:
Le 21/08/2014 17:22, Miller Puckette a écrit :
There are similar limitations in the MIDI implementation that have been in
place for years: you can't get note-off velocities (they're mapped to
zero-velocity note-ons).
most hardware send note-on with 0 velocity as a note-off.
that's not a problem of the midi implementation, but in midi specification.
cheers
c
cheers
Miller
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
