On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 03:51:38PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2014-09-30 12:20, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > I see that there now are the rather peculiar "list fromsymbol" and > > "list tosymbol" methods in [list], but the much needed "list > > foreach" still is missing. Why? > > most likely, because yo can do a [list foreach] as a simple > abstraction (if you don't mind another name), while you cannot do a > [list tosymbol].
Okay, I see. But with the same logic, [list length] could be considered superfluous. list-drip.pd, the equivalent abstraction to "list foreach" in the [list]-abs is the most used abstraction in the whole collection. Although Matju's implementation is highly optimized, including "list foreach" as an interal method would speed things up immensely. Oh, "list cat" would as well. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
