I should fix this - I took down paf~ years ago when IRCAM complained. But the patent it expired so I can put it up now if it's worth putting up. But meanwhile, I'm not sure whether it's a good idea, since it's so easy to make the paf~ out of simpler Pd objects. The only gain to having a paf~ object is that it runs faster - I'm not sure that justifies the maintenance.
cheers Miller On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:48:29PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Hi, F13.paf.control mentions the existence of a [paf~] extern that I guess > should be in the extra folder of vanilla, but it ain't there. > > What happened to it? > > The readme.txt in extra on vanilla mentions also about a link to download > it at http://www.crca.ucsd.edu/~tapel - but this link is dead. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
