On 03/13/2015 09:03 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 03/13/2015 08:43 PM, Martin Peach wrote: >> Yes with [vline~] it goes finer, but try using numbers around 756 in the >> upper number box in this patch, I get long intervals, it's as though the >> control rate is aliasing. > > cannot reproduce. (though it's a bit unclear what yo umean by "in the > upper number box" - presumably the rate of the metro that switches the > noise on and off) > > most likely you are seeing an artifact about updating the display graph. > have you tried listening to the result and verified that it sounds > "strange" (i guess thousands and thousands of people have run patches > that turn on/off a sound at a rate of 756ms without having any problems)
ouch, i missed the [* 1e-05]. so your rate is really low, lower than sr. when i change the tabsize to something small (like 44), and the input signal to something more predicatable ([sig~ 0.5]) the pattern looks very nice, with samples alternating between 0 and non-0 (0.5 in my case); every know and then a sample is repeated (e.g. two times 0.5, then continuing with 0, 0.5,...) but this is expected if your toggle-rate is not a multiple of your sr. gfmsdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
