Hi Martin, As it happens, I often use your patch chaosmonster1 as pure data benchmark. Here's why:
- it runs with pd vanilla or extended - it has a realistic mixture of dsp objects - it sounds cool Amongst others I used chaosmonster1 to benchmark pd in double precision, as shown in the table halfway this page: http://www.katjaas.nl/doubleprecision/doubleprecision.html Another benchmark test, done last February when Raspberry Pi 2 was just out: Raspberry Pi B+ can run no more than one chaosmonster1 at default samplerate, while Raspberry Pi 2 can run five (!) instances of it, and my 1 GHz Core2Duo laptop can run eight instances. Thanks! Katja On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:12 PM, martin brinkmann <m...@martin-brinkmann.de> wrote: > does something like this exist? > afaik not, but i think it would be useful to have some more > or less objective and comparable method to measure how well a > system is suited for running pd. > there was a test patch for rjdj on the ipod/phone which consisted > of simply as much osc~-objects as the device could handle. > that worked quite well for checking if a patch would run on > the device or not, but i think it might not cover all possible > properties of a system. > i wonder what such a benchmark should include: a mixture of > floating point and integer computation, audio- and event > calculation, filters, accessing tables, something else? > > bis denn! > martin > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
