I’d follow up with a request for [closebang] in vanilla as well. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > On Jul 5, 2015, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > From: Alexandros Drymonitis <adr...@gmail.com <mailto:adr...@gmail.com>> > Subject: [PD] [initbang] vs [loadbang] > Date: July 5, 2015 at 5:56:29 AM EDT > To: "pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>" > <pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> > > > I've made an abstraction with an arbitrary number of inlets, and in extended > you can save it in a patch as its connections will be maintained (using > [initbang] to create the inlets), but in vanilla it's not possible cause I'm > using [loadbang] and Pd fails to make the connections (as the inlets are > being created after the patch has been loaded). > > Is there a way to achieve the [initbang] effect in vanilla? Or is there any > intention to include [initbang] in a future vanilla release? > > Also, can't seem to find any initbang.c or initbang.pd_darwin. I guess it's > in a file that contains more classes and is called something else. Is there a > way to find a binary or code to compile, so I can use [initbang] in vanilla > on os x?
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
